The Jacksonian Democratic Party And The Whig Party

The Jacksonian Democratic Party and the Whig Party each, exemplified different beliefs on the role of the federal government in the economy and towards westward expansion in the 1830s and 1840s. However, the Jacksonian, laissez faire supporting Democrats and the economic nationalistic Whig party shared almost no beliefs except for the removal of American Indians in the areas their supporters wished to settle. The lack of similarities is because the Whigs formed their own party to oppose President Jackson’s strong-armed leadership style and policies which earned him the nickname â€Å"King Andrew.† The Jacksonian Democratic Party evolved out of the Democratic-Republican Party in the early 1800s, the core of its membership was composed of farmers, immigrants, and white Southerners. The Whigs formed in 1834 and lasted for 20 years, they were the major political party that opposed Andrew Jackson. The Whigs were created based upon the Federalist beliefs in a strong federal g overnment and adopted many Federalist and National Republican policy ideas, including federal funding for internal improvements, a central bank, and high tariffs to protect the growth of manufacturing enterprises. Overall, the Jacksonian Democratic agrarian Party and the industrialization supporting Whig Party had different beliefs toward the role of the federal government in the economy and towards westward expansion. The role of the federal government in the economy was a heated dispute between the JacksonianShow MoreRelatedThe Importance Of Jacksonian Democracy722 Words   |  3 PagesAndrew Jackson, war hero, man of the people, and seventh president of the United States of America led the Jacksonian Democrats; this political group was formed antebellum America. The democrats tried to aggrandize the puissance of lower classes, Americans that did not have as many opportunities unlike the aristocracy. While decreasing the clout of the rich and potent. Economically, they achieved b enefits from governing during a period where huge advances in transportation, which ultimately acceleratedRead MoreThe Democratic Party And Jacksonian Democracy738 Words   |  3 PagesPolitical parties are formed when voters have different ideology regarding government, economics, and politics. The Second Party System emerged after the Democratic and Whig parties came to power in America. The development of this party system was prompted by the clashing philosophies about individual rights, government control, and land acquisition. Despite both parties being equally prevalent in America, the Democratic Party flourished and was drastically much more successful than the Whig Party at impactingRead MoreAndrew Jackson And The Influence Of The Jacksonian Democracy1259 Words   |  6 PagesDuring the 1820s and 1830s, the Democratic Party grew under the influence of the politician Andrew Jackson. The Democrats believed in a limited federal government and supported giving more power to t he states. The economic monopolies in the East concerned the Democrats, they wanted equal opportunity for white males in the South and West. By the presidential election in 1828, new amendments to voting qualifications allowed more white males to vote. With support from this new population of voters,Read MoreBook Review of Liberty and Power Essay959 Words   |  4 Pagesand Power; The Politics of Jacksonian America Hill and Wang, N.Y. Review written by Richard Foust Book Review Harry L. Watson’s book, â€Å"Liberty and Power, The Politics of Jacksonian America†, takes an analytical look at America and her politics during the Age of Jackson. Watson uses the economy and the ideological mindset of the people, to support a powerful argument about the beginning of American political parties and their importance in definingRead More The Key Differences between Whigs and Democrats? Essay1403 Words   |  6 PagesThe major parties since early 1830s in the United States of America were the Democratic Party, organized by Andrew Jackson, and the Whig Party, assembled by Henry Clay from the National Republicans and in opposition to Andrew Jackson. There were no sectional differences between the Democratic Party and the Whig Party, but there were some cultural differences. Whig party operated from the early 1830s to the mid-1850s. The Whigs approved the authority and the power of the Congress over the presidencyRead MoreWhigs vs Democrats758 Words   |  2 PagesJacksonian Democracy amp; Whig Values Emerging from the Jeffersonian Democratic-Republicans in the 1830’s, came a new party, led by the famous Andrew Jackson. This new party derived the same principle of appealing to the average American that their predecessors did. The Jacksonian Democrats took it a step further though, and boasted their dedication to the â€Å"common man† by insisting that the government bowed to the will of the people. They were also a proponent of smaller government, and that allRead MoreThe Jacksonian Democratic Party1423 Words   |  6 Pagesnecessity of the organization of a party, who shall†¦prevent dangerous combinations to subvert these indefeasible and fundamental privileges†, he called for a party to become the sentinel of the original American democracy. And for many, the Jacksonian Democratic Party filled that role. The Democrats, who pursued a democracy that entailed economic and social independence for the common citizen, faced harsh opposition from the Whig Par ty in the Second American Party System. But apart from the politicalRead MoreNorth And South Essay1197 Words   |  5 PagesSecond American Party System was established. This system consisted of two distinct parties, the Democrats and their opponents, who were known as Whigs for the most part. The goal of these two parties was to create a common thought process between the north and the south. Three of the issues prominent in their campaigns to gather votes in these two regions were government, economy, and slavery. Using these topics as foundations, the members of both parties of the Second American Party System aimedRead MoreThe Evolution Of American Democracy Essay1406 Words   |  6 Pagesrights and liberties. On the American frontier, democracy became a way of life, with widespread social, economic and political equality. The system gradually evolved, from Jeffersonian Democracy or the First Party System to Jacksonian Democracy or the Second Party System and later to the Third Party System. In Reconstruction after the Civil War (late 1860s) the newly freed slaves became citizens, and they were given the vote as well. (Web, 1) After 1815 Americans transformed the republic of the FoundingRead MoreThe Presidency and Ideologies of Andrew Jackson Essay927 Words   |  4 Pagesharmony with his idea of the Beautiful and the Just.† This statement truly explains the different reforms that develop politically, economically, socially, and culturally during the Jackson era. This paper had talk about the changes made during the Jacksonian Era’s and explain how the reform’s had aided and injured the United States society. Reforms in Politics Political reforms during the Jackson era occurred to stopped corruption, limit the size of government, and to expand as well as protect

Gandhis Critique of Colonialism and His Definition of Swaraj

Re: What is Gandhis critique of colonialism and how does he define Swaraj? Use the class readings. Western colonialism was a political-economic phenomenon whereby various European nations explored, conquered, settled, and exploited large areas of the world. (Encyclopedia Britannica). Gandhis critique of British colonialism was grounded in a rejection of cultural and racial supremacy; capitalism or socioeconomic inequality; and materialism. Gandhi employed the concepts of Swaraj and satyagraha in his effort to liberate the Indian people from the stranglehold of British rule. First, British colonial rule subjugated and oppressed Indians, and enforced a system where the white British controlled the economic structure. For centuries, the British East India Company exploited the natural resources of the region, generating massive profits and forming a monopoly from sales of cotton, silk, dye, salt, tea, and opium. Acquiring a economic monopoly over Indias resources allowed the East India Company to obtain assume political and legal power over India, and eventually a complete transitio n to British colonial government. The Indian people were prohibited from accessing or in any way controlling the resources of their own land. Over time, British culture and lifestyle infiltrated every aspect of Indian life, impacting the legal system, medicine, science, education, religion, and the very foundation of Indian society. This was problematic because Gandhi believed thatShow MoreRelatedPunjabi9291 Words   |  38 PagesUNIT 19 CONCEPT OF SWARAJ, SATYAGRAHA AND CRITIQUE OF WESTERN CIVILISATION Structure ! I 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 Objectives Introduction The Civilisational Justification and British Rule 19.2.1 Gandhi, Moderates and the Extremists on the Legitimacy of British Rule i I I Gandhis Hind Swaraj 19.3.1 Gandhi, Extremists and British Colonialism 19.3.2 Gandhi, Moderates and British Colonialism 19.3.3 Gandhi on Swaraj 19.4 Gandhis Critique of Modern Civilisation 19.4.1 Western Influences on Gandhi 19Read MoreBritish Impact on India10478 Words   |  42 PagesBritish colonial rule. It was part of a broader conflict that took place, and is in many ways ongoing, within Indian society. In order to organize resistance, upper-caste Indian activists needed to frame Indian identity as united against British colonialism. This was not in of itself difficult, but they wanted to maintain an upper-caste dominance over Indian society. This required upholding classical structures of caste identity for all Indians in their vision of what post-colonial India would look

Sociology and Suicide - 3277 Words

‘’How has Sociology contributed to our understanding of ‘Suicide’†? Introduction The essay will attempt to evaluate and assess how the various theoretical perspectives within sociology have contributed to our understanding of the deviant, individual act of ‘suicide’. This will be achieved by defining and evaluating ‘functionalism’, a ‘macro perspective’ and the application of this functionalistic approach formulated by Emile Durkheim, to the social phenomenon of ‘suicide’. Criticisms in relation to Durkheims’s study will also be evaluated, drawing upon other ‘Positivist’ theories and contrasting, ‘Interpretive’ theories of ‘suicide’, such as ‘Symbolic Interactionism’, a ‘micro perspective’; who’s principles were originally formulated†¦show more content†¦Suicide is regarded as the most common of individual actions, which Durkheim believed was influenced by the ‘social collective’ and not as a result of psychologi cal causalities as other studies had tried to imply. In an attempt to disprove the psychological hypothesis, he sought evidence that would identify the social nature of suicide. This was facilitated through the availability of suicide-rate statistical data collated from a variety of societies located within European countries. From this quantitative research, now termed ‘multivariate analysis’, he devised three conclusions. Within single societies the incidence or rate of suicide remains constant over time, the suicide rate varies between societies and that the suicide rate varies between different groups within the same society. However, â€Å"Durkheim did not deny that particular circumstances would lead to a particular person taking his or her own life, but personal reasons could not account for the suicide rate† (Haralambos et al, 1995, pp819:2). In an endeavour to refute the claim that there was a relationship between the incidents of insanity and the suicide rate, he examined data compiled from members of the Jewish community who had reportedly higher rate of insanity than other religious groups. On conclusion, he found that they had considerable lower rates of suicide (Durkheim, 1952: 166-168). He discovered that a collective tendency or social force, beyond theShow MoreRelatedWhy Durkheim s Work Suicide Is Significant For The Discipline Of Sociology1323 Words   |  6 Pagessociety. In this essay I will discuss the various forms of suicide defined by Durkheim. I will then predicate this explanation by resources to Durkheim meta theory that we ve discussed in lectures. Lastly I will explain why Durkheim’s work Suicide is significant for the discipline of sociology. The action of suicide has been in society since the dawn of man. Before Durkheim’s research, no one has been able to thoroughly explain why suicide occurs within a society. What s so great about Durkheim’sRead MoreWhat Is Sociology?1062 Words   |  5 PagesWhat is sociology? We can start by saying that sociology is the systematic study of human society. Sociology should be more than you find in a good documentary on a social issue. It is certainly more than listings of facts and figures about society. Instead it becomes a form of consciousness a way of thinking, a critical way of seeing the social. Seeing the general in the particular. In his short book ‘Invitation to Sociology’(1963) characterized the sociological perspective as seeing the generalRead MoreIs Sociology a Science1655 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"The study of sociology cannot and should not be seen as scientific† To what extent do sociological arguments and evidence support this view? (33 marks) The debate about whether sociology can be represented as a science has existed for many years. Comte; who first used the word sociology argued that sociology should be based on the methodology of the natural sciences. He argues that the application of natural science methodology to the study of society would produce a ‘positive science of society’Read MoreDifference Between Max Weber And Emile Durkheim1286 Words   |  6 PagesTwo of the fathers of sociology, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber, each worked to establish sociology as a distinct subject of study. However, their understandings of the underpinnings of sociology, and therefore the methods best used to study it, were very different. Together, they give the modern sociologist competing, yet complimentary, tools with which to understand social phenomena. When writing his book, Suicide: A Study in Sociology, Emile Durkheim wanted to show that empirical data could be usedRead MoreEmile Durkheim and The Science of Sociology Essay1294 Words   |  6 Pagesa long family line of rabbis, he had planned to follow in that profession. Durkheim was known as the Father of Sociology. He was a liberal, a modernist, and a nationalist. He was a very ambitious man; this ambition was illustrated by the accomplishments he made over the course of his life. During the conflict surrounding the Dreyfus Affair, Durkheim used the new field of sociology to try to make sense of society and the world around him. The Dreyfus Affair was a government cover up framingRead MoreEmile Durkheim On Suicide Summary1081 Words   |  5 PagesEmile Durkheim states in his book, â€Å"On Suicide: A Study in Sociology,† â€Å"Social man†¦is the masterpiece of existence.† This statement stands out to me because the types of suicide Emile talks about is how man and the social world interact. Emile contributed many things for sociology and one of those things would be, â€Å"developing a new methodology, which focusses on what he calls â€Å"social facts†, or elements of collective life that exist independently of and are able to exert an influence on the individual†Read More Comparing Webers and Durkheims Methodological Contributions to Sociology1727 Words   |  7 PagesMethodological Contributions to Sociology This essay will be examining the methodological contributions both Durkheim and Weber have provided to sociology. It will briefly observe what Positivists are and how their methodologies influence and affect their research. It will also consider what interpretative sociology is, and why their type of methodology is used when carrying out research. It will analyse both Durkheims study of Suicide and also Webers study of TheRead Moreweb dubois1041 Words   |  5 Pages February 4, 2014 Sociology 1000 Chapter 1- In Text Questions 1.How do the perspectives of people from different cultures differ on social issues such as suicide? How does the psychological perspective view suicide? What is unique about the sociologist s perspective? On a social issue such as suicide, cultures differ because many people feel this is a personal problem whereas others feel that this can be a public issue. If a person commits suicide, it may have been as a result of his orRead MoreSociology : A Sociological Perspective1292 Words   |  6 PagesOrigins of Sociology Ashley Drees Ivy Tech Community College Professor Brosmer April 10,2016 What is Sociology Sociology  is the  study of  social behavior or society, including its origins, development, organization, networks, and institutions. Sociology is a social science that uses various methods of empirical investigation and critical analysis to develop a body of knowledge about social order, disorder, and change. Three Main Theoretical Perspectives in Sociology Functional Perspective Read MoreAnalysis of the sociological imagination and its use in sociology.1483 Words   |  6 Pagesleads to an understanding of how the world operates and how we arrived at a certain point in time and what can be done to change social troubles and issues. Critical sociology does not simply accept society as it is, but continues to investigate unexamined ideas. The classical approach, as taken by Max Weber, rejected that sociology should be affected by values and should only deal with facts. This was done in an effort to leave research undertaken in the field, free of outside influences. According

Knowledge Management Principles Tacit and Explicit

Question: Discuss about theKnowledge Management Principlesfor Tacit and Explicit. Answer: What Makes a Set of Data Useful or Useless? According to (Oxford , 2016), the term data refers to raw facts collected and put together for the purpose of analysis. Data becomes useful when it is analyzed, and the information is created out of it data may reach people in the form of messages and may either be important to them of negligible. According to(Nielen, 2012), data processing separates useful data from useless data. Data is considered useless when it cannot be analyzed or does not produce the desired information. Data ids analyzed by purpose if the data collected can serve the intended purpose then it is considered to be important data. A set of data can be useful to a certain category of people but useless to another category because they may have different purposes. For instance, data collected by an automobile organization on their sales and consumer preferences would be useless to another organization operating in a different field of business. Information gained after analyzing data target a unique audience, and it would be useless to a different audience. Data usefulness is grounded on the meaning and the usage of data, when data is relevant to a given context then it is considered important, but the same data would be useless in a different context since it would be regarded as irreverent. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge According to (Frost, 2010) there exist different forms of knowledge and understanding these forms it important in knowledge management. The availability and accessibility of knowledge determine its usefulness. Explicit knowledge is a form of knowledge that has been coded and stored which makes it possible to access and use it. Explicit knowledge is stored in files and can be retrieved when needed, and it can also be modified. Explicit knowledge ensures that people can access to the information that they need. According to (Kane, 2012), explicit knowledge can easily be searched and accessed. Explicit knowledge allows users to collaborate and make the most out of the information. Tacit knowledge is experience based knowledge which an individual has. Its accessibility depends on personal nature and his willingness to share the information. Therefore, tacit knowledge is not easily accessible, unlike explicit knowledge. Tacit knowledge held in the mind of an individual and includes; skills, attitude values, talents among others(Frost, 2010). According to(Kane, 2012), tacit knowledge is the most important asset in the organization since it is the main source of knowledge. To access tacit knowledge, one is required to develop a healthy interaction with the people so that they can share their knowledge. I gathered information about Holden Commodore car from friends and also from Holden web. In my findings, tacit knowledge gathered from friends mainly included the attitudes towards various models of Holden Commodore cars. I was able to understand why some people preferred a certain car model over another. From Holden web which provides explicit knowledge about their cars, I was able to see some of their car models and their qualities. They also resented on the price ranges of their car ((Holden, 2007). Despite the important information gathered from my friends on the experiences and attitudes, they hold towards various Holden models. My decision on the car that I would like to purchase was guided explicit knowledge found on Holden web since it provided me with a diverse knowledge about their cars which I could not get from friends. Roles of Organizational Culture in the Development of Knowledge Management Infrastructure. Organizational culture refers to a set of shared beliefs, practices and norms in an organization. Knowledge management infrastructure is technical and social. Organizational infrastructures are important aspects that help the organization to achieve its objectives. According to(Frost, 2014) Knowledge has some social aspects which partly depend on organizational and community culture. Knowledge sharing depends on the cultural practices of the organization such as willingness and availability of conditions that make knowledge sharing possible. Organizational culture gives the employees a sense of belonging thus creating a common foundation which allows the members of the organization to communicate and understand each other well. Better communication in an organization ensures that there is effective knowledge sharing culture in an organization. According to (Seyedyousefi, et al., 2016) development of mutual trusting an organization allows people to share information freely. If mistrust develops among the members of an organization, then they cannot share information since they develop suspicion on the intentions and behaviors of other members. The willingness of sharing and seeking knowledge is determined by the concept of reciprocity this refers possibility of an individual benefitting from the knowledge he shares in the future. The benefits may be informed of compensation which could be intangible in a form such as building a better reputation of the individual, or the person may get also get the same help in the future. According to (Hossein, 2010), the organization culture can either weaken or strengthen the organization. Negative culture will lead to poor relationships between the members of the organization which alters the functioning of the organization. Role of Organizational Structure in the Development of Knowledge Management Infrastructure. Organizational structures refer to how the organization is organized into some bodies with distinct functions. Organizational structures determine how people in the organization relate to each other. Organizational structure can be categorized into two categories that are, formal and informal structures(Frost, 2010). Formal organization structure outlines the roles of the various departments in the order of hierarchy and the relationship that exists between them. The organization should ensure that the formal structure of the organization does not alter informal structure since this may hinder the process of knowledge sharing and knowledge creation. Therefore an organization should understand that for effective knowledge management in the organization formal and informal structures must be allowed to coexist. Informal structures refer to networks formed as a result of relationships built when people work together. If an organization has well developed informal structures, there exist healthy interactions among the members which ensures effective creation and sharing of knowledge. Community of Practice According to (Trayner, 2011) community of practice refers to a team of people with a common interest or passion who learn through interaction. Human naturally learns through social interactions. Professionals advance their skills through frequent interaction with others in the same field. It is essential for people who have a desire to improve their skills and services to the people to develop better interaction skills mostly with another professional in a similar field of profession. According to (Trayner, et al., 2014)Community of Practice has three essential elements; The domain: this refers to a common interest that the members want to learn through sharing. The community: this refers to the overall group of people who come together with the aim of The practice: practice is a byproduct of learning. Interaction among the members instills skills in them which help them improve in their profession. Benefit of Community of Practice to a Local Hospital According to (Mitchel Wood, 2012) benefits of a community of practice can be grouped into two that is, depending on the effect it has on an individual or the organization. Benefits on Individuals It assists the employees in managing change, in case an organization makes changes the experts in the organization may decide to organize themselves and discuss the changes in the organization and how they can adapt to the changes. Provides new knowledge to the members of the organization. Through a community of practice, members learn from one another. Through these interactions, members can freely share knowledge thus enabling individuals to gain knowledge. It boosts trust and commonness of purpose among the members of the organization. Through a community of practice, members can support each other through sharing and solving problems. The community of practice adds value to professional lives of the members of the organization. By sharing experiences and knowledge members can advance their professional Benefits to the Organization. The community of practice enables the members to come with new knowledge and enhance skill development in an organization. Participation of members allows them to contribute and learn which betters their skills. The community of practice uses knowledge management to drive a strategy. Through a community of practice, information on the organization easily and effectively disseminated to the members. Facilitate timely and effective response to customer demands since the organization can identify the members who can effectively respond to their client's demands. Enable new employees to learn the practices of the organization within a short period thereby facilitating easy adaptation in the organization. References Frost, A., 2010. Managing organizational structures. Knowledge Management Journal, pp. 1-7. Frost, A., 2010. The Different Types of Knowledge. Knowledge Management Articles. Frost, A., 2014. Knowledge Management: The significance of organizational culture.. Knowledge Management Articles. Holden, 2007. Your Journey Starts Here, s.l.: Holden. Hossein, S. M., 2010. A study on the function of knowledge management in universities. Cultural Management Journal, Volume 8, pp. 2-19. Kane, J., 2012. Knowledge communities: Explicit knowledge vs. Tacit knowledge. Impact. Mitchel, J. Wood, S., 2012. Benefits of the community of practice. Community Practice, pp. 1-2. Nielen, G., 2012. Information systems in a management structure.. s.l.: Springer. Oxford, 2016. English Oxford is living dictionaries. s.l.:s.n. Seyedyousefi, N., Fard, s. M. H. FatemeTohidi, 2016. The role of organizational culture in knowledge management. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences., 7(5), p. 3. Trayner, E. W.-. et al., 2014. Learning in landscapes of practice.. s.l.: Cambridge University Press. Trayner, W., 2011. What is a community of practice?. Team Be.